当前位置:首页 Renewed Theory Quest
The Mind/Matter Issue in Eastern Philosophical Perspective (0): Introduction 
作者:[Sherwin Lu] 来源:[] 2011-08-09
摘要:-- Major Idea, Table of Contents & Head Poem
  
EDITOR’S NOTE: This is an introduction to a long series of postings by the author discussing the philosophical mind/matter issue in semipopular language. This long series is actually a combined and restructured translation by the author himself of his two earlier essays (2006, 2007) formerly written in Chinese on the same subject. As the language is not very formal on the whole, those readers who are not used to formal philosophy should not be scared away by a few unavoidable special terms. And what is more important, this discussion provides a epistemological basis for a correct comprehension of the author’s and more extensively of the New Legalist’s discussions on political, economic and cultural matters. 
 
Major Idea

All the problems confronting the mankind today, philosophically and finally speaking, have their origin in a mind-matter split worldview. To successfully tackle the problems, it is imperative to go back to the Eastern MindMatter-as-one philosophy. As the mind-matter dichotomy, together with the resulting materialism-vs.-idealism polemic, has originated in the West, a sound understanding of its faulty nature and harmfulness is possible only if it is viewed in the Eastern philosophical perspective.
 

Table of Contents


1-0          MindMatter-as-One: Ontology & Epistemology

1-1             Relative selfhood of human individuals, groups and all beings
1-2             MindMatter-as-One ontology:Negation of ego-centrism of human individuals, groups, nations and species
1-3             MindMatter-as-One epistemology: Metaphysical basis for social theories

2-0          From “Transcendental Chaos” to Mind-Matter Split

2-1   A thought experiment
2-2   The indescribable “Transcendental Chaos”
2-3   Coming about of the “Human-Perceived World”
2-4   Coming about of the mind-matter split
2-5   Intangibility of the “Human-Perceived World”
2-6   Limitedness of Human Knowledge

3-0          Return to Eastern Philosophy: Negation of philosophical realism (实在论) and its extensions in various fields of academic thought

3-1        Philosophical categories -- space, time, & causality:
From substantialism (real existence) to relativism (relative perception)
3-2        Philosophical theory of knowledge (1):
From materialism-idealism divide to mind-matter interaction
3-3        Philosophical theory of knowledge (2):
From scientism to deconstructionism
3-4        Philosophical methodology (1):
From formal logic to fuzzy logic –
From the classic to a new “law of non-contradiction”
3-5        Philosophical methodology (2):
From self-contained substances to dynamic relatedness
               as focus of attention 
3-6        Theoretical physics:
From elementary particle to wave-particle duality
3-7        Social ethics:
From atomism-monolithism
to theory of interaction on and across multiple levels
3-8         Political economy:
From capitalist-imperialist hegemoniceconomics
to overall balance-oriented world political economy
       3-9      Medical science and self-help health preserving:
       From piecemeal treatment to mind-body wholeness


4-0 Transcend Mind-Matter Divide to Reach Realm of Happiness

 
Head Poem
 
A Poem being Not a Poem
 
Mountains are not high
They are, as seen by rivers
Rivers not flowing
They are, as seen by trees
Trees not green
They are, as seen by birds
Birds not singing
They are, as seen by humans
Humans not earthly
They are, as seen by gods
Gods not heavenly
They are, as seen by you and me
 
Mountains are not mountains, but seen so
Rivers are not rivers, but seen so
Trees are not trees, but seen so
Birds are not birds, but seen so
Humans are not humans, but seen so
Gods are not gods, but seen so
 
What sees ‘n sees what
Which is mind ‘n which matter
Matter is mind ‘n vice versa
They’re one and the same
Formless and nameless
Call it Dao, for the sake of naming
 
 
                                                     (Original in Chinese, April 2003,
                                                                               English translation by the author, June 1, 2011)
 
 

相关文章:
·明浩:“民族”英文翻译应为“minzu”
·Quentin Fottrell:经济学家打死不会承认的10件事
·小笑话: “CHINA”该怎么念?
·翟玉忠:为什么说中国能拯救世界(再答Phillip Qin)
·翟玉忠:为什么说中国能拯救世界(答Phillip Qin)
大六经工程 |  国学网站 |  香港中国文化研究院 |  联合早报网 |  时代Java教程 |  观察者网 | 
环球网 |  文化纵横网 |  四月网 |  南怀瑾文教基金会 |  学习时报网 |  求是网 | 
恒南书院 |  海疆在线 | 
版权所有:新法家网站  联系电话:13683537539 13801309232   联系和投稿信箱:alexzhaid@163.com     
京ICP备05073683号  京公网安备11010802013512号