当前位置:首页 Current Affairs Review
Occupy Wall Street: A long way from Congress: Nearly half the members were millionaires 
作者:[Al Kamen] 来源:[] 2011-11-01
摘要:A symbolic picture of capitalist democracy -- The New Legalist

 
A symbolic picture of capitalist democracy

Source: washingtonpost.com


Members of Congress have been largely loath to dirty the hems of their suits wandering among the tents of the Occupy Wall Street folks.

Maybe that’s because it’s a politically fraught movement. (Are they the new tea party? What about the violence? The mess!).

Or perhaps many lawmakers simply can’t identify with the “other 99 percent” that the protesters claim to represent.

And that’s because nearly half of the members of Congress (46 percent) were millionaires in 2009, according to the required financial disclosure forms, our colleague Emily Heil reports.

Only 1 percent of all Americans are millionaires, according to data analyzed by the Center for Responsive Politics. So inside the Capitol dome, the much-vilified “one percenters” lampooned by the protesters as champagne-swilling, stogie-chomping elites are just . . . kinda ordinary.

In fact, in the Senate, counting oneself among the nation’s top 1 percent makes you only, well, just an average schmo. The median net worth in that august body is a whopping $2.4 million. (The figure for the House is a paltry $725,000, just a tad above the poverty line.) And while there are plenty of ways to reckon who numbers among the nation’s upper percentages, there are plenty of indisputably flush folks wearing member pins.

Consider Rep. Darrell Issa (R-Calif.), the richest guy in Congress. He’s worth somewhere between $156 million and $451 million. Sen. John F. Kerry (D-Mass.), who is the second-richest, has assets that could be as high as $294 million. Even the 20th-ranking congressional fat cat, Rep. Kenny Marchant (R-Tex.), may be worth as much as $63 million.

Of course, Congress’s wealth reporting isn’t exact: Members of the House and Senate are required to report their assets only in ranges, so the figures we’re citing for the rankings (as crunched by the Center for Responsive Politics) are just averages. And they don’t have to report certain assets, such as their fine homes or their spouses’ earnings.

So they could be, and probably are, richer still.

Which means if protesters really do want to “eat the rich,” they need look only to the Capitol building for an endless buffet.


相关文章:
·美联储理事Waller:美元的国际地位进一步增强而非相反
·Bradford Delong:美国的警钟为谁而鸣
大六经工程 |  国学网站 |  香港中国文化研究院 |  联合早报网 |  时代Java教程 |  观察者网 | 
环球网 |  文化纵横网 |  四月网 |  南怀瑾文教基金会 |  学习时报网 |  求是网 | 
恒南书院 |  海疆在线 | 
版权所有:新法家网站  联系电话:13683537539 13801309232   联系和投稿信箱:alexzhaid@163.com     
京ICP备05073683号  京公网安备11010802013512号